In paragraph 5, Karl decides to bend the law and drive on the shoulder. What inference about Karl's motivation or his view of the law can readers draw from his behavior at this point in the story? What evidence is there in the story to support this inference?
In your response, be sure to tell what inference can be drawn about Karl's motivation or his view of the law, and cite at least two pieces of evidence from the story that support the inference.
From Karl's decision to bend the law and drive on the shoulder in paragraph 5, readers can infer that Karl is motivated by his impatience and has a disregard for the law. This can be supported by two pieces of evidence from the story.
Firstly, the text mentions that Karl is "frustrated by the long line of traffic ahead." This frustration indicates his impatience, suggesting that he is willing to break the law in order to reach his destination faster. His decision to drive on the shoulder can be seen as a way to bypass the traffic and get ahead of other cars, highlighting his impatience.
Secondly, the mention of Karl "smirking as he zoomed past the stopped cars" provides evidence of his disregard for the law. His smirk implies a sense of satisfaction or amusement, suggesting that he takes pleasure in breaking the rules and bypassing other drivers who are adhering to traffic laws. This behavior indicates that he does not hold respect for the law and views it as something he can bend or ignore at his convenience.
Therefore, readers can infer from Karl's decision to drive on the shoulder that he is motivated by impatience and has a disregard for the law, with evidence of his frustration and smirk supporting this inference.