Identify why Sweden was relatively more successful than Denmark and Norway based on maps, geographic location, and resources.(1 point)
Responses
Sweden had greater distance from its enemies such as England and Russia.
Sweden had more fertile land because of inland rivers.
Sweden’s mountainous terrain protected it from enemies.
Sweden had access to fjords.
Note: The response provided is based on general observations and may not be comprehensive or entirely accurate.
One possible response could be:
Sweden's geographic location, resources, and physical features contributed to its relative success compared to Denmark and Norway.
1) Distance from enemies: Sweden had the advantage of being further away from potential threats such as England and Russia. This distance helped provide a buffer zone, reducing the likelihood of invasion or conflicts.
2) Fertile land: Sweden benefited from inland rivers, which provided a consistent water source for agricultural purposes. This fertile land allowed for better farming conditions and higher agricultural productivity, which could have contributed to economic prosperity.
3) Mountainous terrain: Sweden's mountainous terrain acted as a natural defense barrier, making it more challenging for enemies to invade. This geographical feature likely played a role in protecting the country from potential invasions or conflicts.
4) Access to fjords: Fjords, which are narrow inlets bordered by steep cliffs, were present in Sweden. Access to these fjords could have provided advantages for trade, fishing, and transportation, bolstering the country's economic activities.
It is important to note that these factors alone may not fully explain Sweden's relative success compared to Denmark and Norway. Other factors such as political stability, social issues, historical events, and cultural influences should also be taken into account for a comprehensive understanding.
what is the correct answer
Based on the given options, the correct answer would be:
Sweden's mountainous terrain protected it from enemies.
To identify why Sweden was relatively more successful than Denmark and Norway based on maps, geographic location, and resources, we can analyze the given responses.
1. Sweden had greater distance from its enemies such as England and Russia:
To determine the distance between Sweden and its neighboring countries like England and Russia, we can refer to a map. By using an online mapping tool or a physical map, we can measure the distance between Sweden and England and compare it with Denmark and Norway. Similarly, we can measure the distance between Sweden and Russia and compare it with Denmark and Norway.
2. Sweden had more fertile land because of inland rivers:
To assess the fertility of the land in Sweden compared to Denmark and Norway, we can again refer to a map. By studying the topology of the region, particularly the presence of rivers and water bodies, we can determine the availability of fertile land. We can locate major rivers in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway on a map and compare their distribution and proximity to fertile areas.
3. Sweden's mountainous terrain protected it from enemies:
To understand Sweden's mountainous terrain and its impact on defense, we can again consult a map. By examining the topography of the three countries, we can identify the presence of mountains and their location in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway. Comparing the mountain ranges and their proximity to major cities or strategic locations, we can assess the level of protection they provided to Sweden against potential enemies.
4. Sweden had access to fjords:
Fjords are narrow, deep inlets of the sea, typically found in Norway. To determine the access to fjords in Sweden compared to Denmark and Norway, we can again utilize a map. By locating and analyzing the distribution of fjords in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, we can determine the extent to which Sweden had access to these natural features that could have provided strategic, economic, or other advantages.
By examining maps and considering the geographic characteristics and resources mentioned in the given responses, we can gauge the relative success of Sweden compared to Denmark and Norway. However, it is important to note that success is influenced by various factors, and these geographic aspects are just a few of the many elements that can contribute to a country's prosperity.