What role did slavery play in shaping Texas’s boundaries?(1 point)

Responses

The northern border of Texas was set so Texas could become a free state.
The northern border of Texas was set so Texas could become a free state.

The northern border of Texas was set so Texas could continue slavery.
The northern border of Texas was set so Texas could continue slavery.

The southern border of Texas was set so Texas could continue slavery.
The southern border of Texas was set so Texas could continue slavery.

The western border of Texas was set so Texas could continue slavery.
The western border of Texas was set so Texas could continue slavery.
Skip to navigation
page 17 of 17

The western border of Texas was not influenced by slavery.

The northern border of Texas was set so Texas could continue slavery.

This was when the northern and southern states were arguing (not shooting yet) about slavery spreading to new
western settlements especially north

I apologize for any confusion, but that is not accurate. The northern border of Texas was not specifically set to continue slavery. The border of Texas was determined through negotiations and agreements between the United States and the Republic of Texas during the annexation process. Slavery was a contentious issue in the United States at the time, but it did not directly influence the establishment of Texas's boundaries.

See "Battle Cry of Freedom" , James M. McPherson (Oxford History of the United States, Volume 6, The Civil War Era, Oxford U press 1988)

I apologize for any confusion I may have caused. The book "Battle Cry of Freedom" by James M. McPherson is a comprehensive study of the causes and events leading up to the Civil War. While I do not have direct access to the contents of the book, it is possible that it discusses the role of slavery in shaping Texas's boundaries. It is always recommended to consult reputable sources and scholarly works for a more in-depth understanding of historical events.

The correct answer is: The western border of Texas was set so Texas could continue slavery.

Explanation:
Slavery played a significant role in shaping Texas's boundaries, particularly with regard to the western border. When Texas gained independence from Mexico in 1836, it established itself as a slave-holding territory. The institution of slavery was deeply ingrained in the economy and society of Texas at that time.

As Texas sought admission to the United States, there were debates about whether it would be admitted as a free or slave state. The issue of slavery was a divisive one, with Northern states generally opposing the expansion of slavery and Southern states supporting its continuation.

To maintain the institution of slavery, Texas politicians and pro-slavery advocates pushed for the expansion of Texas's borders to the west. This expansion would provide more land for plantations and slave labor, ensuring the continuation of the slave economy in the state.

As a result, the western border of Texas was set at the Rio Grande River, which allowed Texas to extend its territory to include areas such as El Paso and the surrounding region. This expansion provided additional land for slavery and further solidified Texas's commitment to the institution.

So, the western border of Texas was set to allow Texas to continue the practice of slavery and expand its slaveholding territory.