Login or Sign Up
Menu
Ask a New Question

Vote No on the Highway 85 Extension

by Victoria Vail, Tribune staff writer

Next week, the city council will consider a proposal to extend Highway 85 by 10 miles. A small coalition of real estate developers have hurried this proposal forward, hoping to capitalize on state tax breaks and reassuring the city that their intentions are good. In truth, however, the proposed extension would hurt our community. It would be bad for downtown businesses, bad for families, and bad for the environment.

Bad for Downtown Businesses

Developers claim that the land west of town is ripe to be turned into a combined retail/residential area. They say that the extension of Highway 85 would give shoppers access to a greater variety of stores. In truth, though, we already have a great variety of stores downtown—over 200 of them. Many of these businesses have been hurting for several years due to the neglect of the Exit 10 overpass, which has made driving difficult. Extending Highway 85 would give shoppers a reason to avoid downtown altogether—likely dooming many small businesses and leaving buildings vacant. However, the overpass could be repaired at a fraction of the cost of the highway extension. This small investment in city infrastructure would be good for businesses and shoppers alike.

What is the author’s purpose in the passage above?

The author's purpose in the passage above is to persuade readers to vote against the proposed extension of Highway 85.

can you give me 2-3 sentences?

The author's purpose in the passage is to convince readers that the proposed extension of Highway 85 would be detrimental to the community. They argue that it would negatively impact downtown businesses, families, and the environment.

The author's purpose in the passage above is to persuade the readers to vote "No" on the proposal to extend Highway 85. The author presents arguments against the extension, highlighting the negative impact it would have on downtown businesses, families, and the environment. The intention is to convince the readers that extending the highway would be detrimental to the community and that alternative solutions, such as repairing the Exit 10 overpass, would be more beneficial.