How is feudalism different from manorialism
Feudalism prevented serfs from being independent.
Feudalism did not require military allegiance.
Feudalism controlled relationships between monarchs and serfs.
Feudalism controlled relationships between nobles and monarchs
Manorialism, on the other hand, focused on the organization and structure of agricultural estates or manors. It involved the relationship between the lord of the manor and the serfs or peasants who lived and worked on the estate. The lord provided protection and certain rights to the serfs in exchange for their labor and a portion of their produce.
In contrast, feudalism encompassed a broader social, political, and economic system that extended beyond the manor. It was a hierarchical system of relationships based on land ownership and military service. Feudalism involved the relationship between the monarch and the nobles, as well as the obligations and privileges between the nobles themselves.
Feudalism required military allegiance, where vassals (nobles) pledged loyalty and military service to their lords (monarchs or higher-ranking nobles) in exchange for land and protection. Manorialism, on the other hand, did not have this military component.
Overall, feudalism and manorialism were interconnected systems that coexisted and often overlapped. While both involved relationships between different social classes, feudalism focused more on the obligations and power dynamics between nobles and monarchs, while manorialism centered around the relationships between lords and serfs on individual manors.