Which of the following is true about electronic surveillance? Select all that apply. (1 point) Responses Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls. Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls. Police may place surveillance devices on suspected criminals’ phones Police may place surveillance devices on suspected criminals’ phones Police can plant viruses on smart phones of suspected drug runners. Police can plant viruses on smart phones of suspected drug runners. Private citizens can monitor other people’s telephone calls. Private citizens can monitor other people’s telephone calls. Private citizens can record their own telephone calls in most states.

To determine which statements about electronic surveillance are true, we will go through each option one by one.

1. "Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls."
This statement is true. According to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, law enforcement generally needs a warrant issued by a judge in order to conduct electronic surveillance, including monitoring telephone calls.

2. "Police may place surveillance devices on suspected criminals' phones."
This statement is true. In some cases, with proper authorization, law enforcement may place surveillance devices on the phones of suspected criminals as a part of their investigation.

3. "Police can plant viruses on smartphones of suspected drug runners."
This statement is true. It is within the realm of possibility for law enforcement to plant viruses or malware on the smartphones of suspected drug runners or other criminals to gather evidence or monitor their activities. However, the legality and specific procedures for this would vary depending on jurisdiction and the specifics of the case.

4. "Private citizens can monitor other people's telephone calls."
This statement is false. Generally, private citizens do not have the legal authority to monitor or intercept other people's telephone calls without proper authorization. Engaging in such activities without permission can be considered a violation of privacy laws.

5. "Private citizens can record their own telephone calls in most states."
This statement is generally true. In many states, it is legal for individuals to record their own telephone calls without the consent of the other party involved. However, it is important to note that laws regarding this may vary from state to state, so it is always best to consult local laws or seek legal advice to ensure compliance.

Therefore, the true statements about electronic surveillance from the given options are:

- Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls.
- Police may place surveillance devices on suspected criminals' phones.
- Police can plant viruses on smartphones of suspected drug runners.
- Private citizens can record their own telephone calls in most states.

It is worth mentioning that laws and regulations regarding electronic surveillance can differ from country to country, so it is important to consider the specific jurisdiction in question when discussing this topic.

i can only pick to explain bot