what are some arguments for keeping the jails in public hands.
Many, many criminals are very complex disturbed, pathological and antisocial individuals. There is not a clear understanding how to deal with them. If we can't understand these complex individuals, how would a contract with a private company be structured or supervised?
Recently there was a move in my area to "contract" out the jailing of youthful offenders. This very issue jumped into the forefront, as case after case of inappropriate actions took place in these youth prisons. Currently, it is being "studied", whatever that means.
These sites have more information.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7197489.stm
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/scottishprisons/SNP-plan-to-scrap-private.3287518.jp
http://www.opseu.org/news/Press99/May1699.htm
To find arguments for keeping jails in public hands, it is helpful to explore different perspectives. One way to approach this is by considering the following points:
1. Accountability and Transparency: Publicly-run jails are often subject to more rigorous oversight and accountability measures compared to private prisons. The government, being responsible for public welfare, can be held directly accountable for the conditions, treatment, and rehabilitation efforts within these facilities. Public control ensures transparency, making it easier to uncover and address any potential abuses or misconduct.
2. Rehabilitation Focus: Critics argue that private prisons have a profit-driven motive, which may prioritize cost-cutting measures over effective rehabilitation programs. Publicly-operated jails are more likely to focus on providing necessary resources and programs aimed at reducing recidivism rates, as they prioritize the long-term betterment of incarcerated individuals rather than generating profit.
3. Public Interest over Profit: Detention facilities are critical components of the criminal justice system, involving the deprivation of liberty. Some argue that such a fundamental responsibility should remain solely in the hands of public institutions, as they are more likely to prioritize public interest over generating revenue for shareholders.
4. Equality and Fairness: Public management of jails can help ensure equal treatment for all those within the justice system, regardless of their socioeconomic background. The concern with private prisons is that for-profit organizations may selectively accept or reject inmates based on profitability, potentially exacerbating racial or socio-economic disparities.
5. Cost Control: While private prisons often claim to be more cost-effective, the evidence on cost savings is mixed. Public facilities have the advantage of using public funds, allowing for greater control in the allocation of resources. Public operations can also leverage economies of scale and avoid profit margins, potentially reducing overall costs in the long run.
It is worth noting that the arguments for public or private control of jails are complex and can vary depending on local circumstances and specific contexts. Considering a range of perspectives and engaging in informed public debates is crucial for the ongoing improvement and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.