Review the section of the text below to answer the question.

But what if our voting habits changed overnight? What if those 60 million adults who've been sitting out showed up November 3?
Wait, you say. Voting is pointless. Politicians do what they want, you argue. Democracy is broken, you shrug.
Well. it's only broken in the way that your dust-collecting exercise bike or rowing machine doesn't work. It doesn't work because you're not using it.
When huge swaths of the American people don't vote, we cede outsized power to the people who actually do vote. If we as an entire nation vote, things in Washington (and in our state and local goverments) will be
transformed
How does the author address conflicting viewpoints?
Explain in a RARE response. (4 points)

The author addresses conflicting viewpoints by acknowledging and responding to them directly. They mention the viewpoint that voting is pointless and that politicians do what they want, and they counter this by comparing the broken democratic system to a dust-collecting exercise bike or rowing machine. They argue that the system doesn't work because people are not using it, and they highlight the importance of everyone voting in order to transform the government. Overall, the author addresses conflicting viewpoints by presenting counterarguments and offering a different perspective.