Use the following text to answer the question.

Fact: It can be unsafe to eat raw meats.

Tessa: Meat needs to be cooked thoroughly to kill diseases like E. coli and Salmonella.

Rosa: Millions of people around the world live in cultures that eats raw fish and beef everyday.

How might a person who agrees with Rosa argue Tessa's interpretation of the fact?

(1 point)
Responses

Not every culture has E. coli and Salmonella.
Not every culture has E. coli and Salmonella.

Millions of people don't know how to cook meat.
Millions of people don't know how to cook meat.

Not every piece of uncooked meat is diseased.
Not every piece of uncooked meat is diseased.

Millions of people have never had E. coli or Salmonella.

Millions of people have never had E. coli or Salmonella.

I chose millions of people have never had E.coli or Salmonella is this true?

That is wrong

A person who agrees with Rosa's perspective might argue against Tessa's interpretation of the fact by considering the following points:

1. Not every culture has E. coli and Salmonella: They could argue that while it is true that cooking meat thoroughly kills disease-causing bacteria, not every culture around the world encounters these specific bacteria. They might contend that in some cultures, the risk of E. coli and Salmonella contamination is lower or nonexistent, making it safer to consume raw meats.

2. Millions of people don't know how to cook meat: They could argue that even if E. coli and Salmonella are present in some cultures, not every individual within those cultures is knowledgeable or skilled in cooking meat thoroughly. Therefore, consuming raw meats may be a safer option for them to avoid potential health risks associated with undercooked or improperly cooked meat.

3. Not every piece of uncooked meat is diseased: They could point out that while it is important to practice safe food handling and ensure proper cooking techniques to eliminate pathogens, not every single piece of uncooked meat is guaranteed to be contaminated. They might suggest that selecting high-quality, fresh, and properly stored meats can reduce the risk of encountering disease-causing bacteria, making raw consumption safer in certain scenarios.

4. Millions of people have never had E. coli or Salmonella: They could argue that millions of people around the world consume raw fish and beef daily without experiencing any cases of E. coli or Salmonella. This could be used as evidence to suggest that the risk associated with consuming raw meats may be lower than what Tessa is implying.

In summary, a person who agrees with Rosa might use these points to argue against Tessa's interpretation of the fact that it can be unsafe to eat raw meats.