Now it’s time to complete your Portfolio. Use all of your analysis from the previous lessons to help you write your essay. Please follow the format below to write 3 paragraphs about these texts:
Paragraph One
Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.
Answer:
Paragraph Two
Write a paragraph in which you explain why it matters when the two authors interpret the same facts differently. Using specific examples from the two texts, describe the impact of the authors’ differing interpretations of the facts on you as a reader.
Answer:
Paragraph Three
Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflicting point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
Answer:
Paragraph One
Experienced readers can use a set of steps to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. First, they should carefully read and compare the information presented in each text to identify any conflicting details or claims. Then, they should research the credibility and bias of the authors, considering factors such as their expertise, affiliations, and potential motivations. Next, it is important for readers to evaluate the evidence and sources provided in each text, looking for any inconsistencies or gaps in logic. Finally, readers should determine which text presents a more balanced and well-supported argument by weighing the credibility and reliability of the information presented. It is crucial for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information because it allows them to make informed decisions and form their own opinions based on reliable and accurate information. For example, in Text 1, the author argues that climate change is primarily caused by human activities, while in Text 2, the author claims that climate change is a natural phenomenon. By analyzing these conflicting viewpoints, readers can better understand the complexity of the problem and assess the validity of each argument.
Paragraph Two
When two authors interpret the same facts differently, it can have a significant impact on the reader. In the case of Text 1 and Text 2, the authors' differing interpretations of the facts about climate change can influence the reader's understanding and perspective on the issue. For instance, if the reader is more inclined to believe the author of Text 1, who emphasizes human activities as the main cause of climate change, they may be more likely to support policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable practices. On the other hand, if the reader assigns more credibility to the author of Text 2, who presents climate change as a natural occurrence, they may view environmental regulations as unnecessary and instead focus on adapting to the changing climate. These different interpretations can shape the reader's stance and actions regarding critical environmental issues.
Paragraph Three
Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive by presenting a balanced and fair assessment of the topic. When readers encounter a well-constructed argument that acknowledges and addresses opposing viewpoints, they are more likely to trust the author's credibility and consider the overall argument as thoughtful and unbiased. This approach not only strengthens the author's persuasive appeal but also provides readers with a more comprehensive understanding of the topic. For example, if an author discussing gun control presents both sides of the debate, acknowledging concerns about individual rights and public safety, readers are more likely to trust the author's fairness and be open to considering their argument. By including conflicting viewpoints, authors create an opportunity for readers to critically engage with the topic, weigh the evidence, and make informed decisions.