Which would be a sound argument for the proposition that a community should sponsor a riverfront clean-up day?(1 point)
Responses
A clean-up day would bring the community together on a project to reduce pollution and beautify the parks.
A clean-up day would bring the community together on a project to reduce pollution and beautify the parks.
Many people in our community enjoy walking by the riverfront.
Many people in our community enjoy walking by the riverfront.
Students need more community service hours for graduation, and a clean-up day is a fun option.
Students need more community service hours for graduation, and a clean-up day is a fun option.
The Ohio River is nearly 1,000 miles long from end to end, and that's more than one-third of the length of the Mississippi River.
A sound argument for the proposition that a community should sponsor a riverfront clean-up day is that it would bring the community together on a project to reduce pollution and beautify the parks. This argument highlights the social and environmental benefits of such an event. To arrive at this answer, we can evaluate each response provided and assess its strength.
The first response states that a clean-up day would bring the community together on a project to reduce pollution and beautify the parks. This argument emphasizes the collaborative effort of the community towards a common goal and the positive impact it would have on the environment and aesthetics of the area. It is a strong argument as it aligns with the purpose of a clean-up day.
The second response mentions that many people in the community enjoy walking by the riverfront. While this statement emphasizes the popularity of the riverfront, it does not directly address the need for a clean-up day or its benefits. It is not a strong argument for sponsoring a riverfront clean-up day.
The third response suggests that students need more community service hours for graduation, and a clean-up day would be a fun option to fulfill those requirements. This argument appeals to the need for community service hours and presents a clean-up day as an enjoyable way to contribute. It is a valid point but might not be the strongest argument as it does not directly address the broader benefits to the community or the environment.
The fourth response provides information about the Ohio River's length compared to the Mississippi River. While this fact may be interesting, it does not offer a direct argument for sponsoring a riverfront clean-up day. It is not a strong argument in support of the proposition.
Overall, the first response is the strongest argument for the proposition as it highlights the community's collaboration to reduce pollution and enhance the riverfront's beauty.