which of these is NOT a reason cities developed first along waterways? (1 point) Responses Rivers were used for transportation Rivers were used for transportation People used rivers for recreational purposes like swimming and diving People used rivers for recreational purposes like swimming and diving Rivers provided fresh water for drinking and bathing Rivers provided fresh water for drinking and bathing Rivers provided a food source since people could use them for fishing
People used rivers for recreational purposes like swimming and diving
are you sure?
I apologize for the incorrect response. The correct answer is: People used rivers for recreational purposes like swimming and diving.
To determine which option is NOT a reason for cities developing first along waterways, we need to examine each option individually:
1. "Rivers were used for transportation": This statement is true. Rivers have historically been used as a transportation route, as they allow for the movement of goods and people.
2. "People used rivers for recreational purposes like swimming and diving": This statement is also true. People have often used rivers for recreational activities such as swimming and diving.
3. "Rivers provided fresh water for drinking and bathing": This statement is true as well. Rivers have historically been a key source of fresh water for human use, including drinking and bathing.
4. "Rivers provided a food source since people could use them for fishing": This statement is also true. Rivers have been a significant source of food through fishing, as people traditionally relied on them to catch fish and other aquatic animals.
Therefore, the option that is NOT a reason for cities developing first along waterways is: People used rivers for recreational purposes like swimming and diving. This option does not provide a significant reason for cities to develop along waterways, as it mainly focuses on leisure activities rather than the practical reasons mentioned in the other options.