Good start! Thank you for the time you spent on this assignment.
What was the author's purpose? To persuade? Entertain? Inform? How do you know? Please clarify your response.
Please take another look at text structure. Does the author use cause/effect, description, problem/solution, sequence, compare/contrast or another text structure? How did the author's choice of text structure help you as a reader? For more information on text structure, please see unit 7, lesson 2.
Think about the author's point of view, which is the author's attitude towards the topic being discussed. What else could you share about that that would show a deeper understanding of the text?
More textual evidence would improve your answer and demonstrate a deeper understanding of the text. What evidence in the text could serve to prove your points?
The directions ask that you analyze how the author distinguished their position from other positions. What did the author say that made her viewpoint special? Explain what you learned from thinking about the different positions. Give examples from the texts. (See Unit 7, Lesson 4 for help)
That was teachers responce
She wants a corrected bersion of this
The author's deliberate choice of structure enhances the reader's comprehension by providing detailed explanations and relatable anecdotes. They discuss personal obstacles, which fosters a connection with the audience. Additionally, the author draws on the lives of renowned individuals who, despite their imperfections, continue to inspire.
The primary intention of the author in "Perfectly Imperfect" is to advocate for the significance of imperfections and emphasize the importance of embracing them. The author strives to convey that these flaws contribute to one's uniqueness and should be a source of pride. By altering the prevailing perspective on imperfections, the author seeks to position them as admirable attributes.
The author firmly believes that flaws should be embraced and celebrated, as evident in their choice of words, which consistently express adoration for imperfections. The overall tone of the text is positive and upbeat, underscoring their affinity for the subject matter.
Considering the author's purpose and point of view facilitates a deeper understanding of the topic. It elucidates the reasons behind the author's exaltation of imperfections and highlights the societal pressure to conform to a flawless ideal.
The author's perspective diverges significantly from conventional notions, advocating for the overthrow of societal expectations and the acceptance of imperfections. In contrast, others may contend that flaws should be concealed, striving for perfection. However, the author substantiates their argument by providing compelling examples.
Engaging with contrasting viewpoints has revealed a distinct range of attitudes towards imperfections. Society indoctrinates individuals to adhere to particular standards, yet challenging these norms and forming personal viewpoints is imperative.
The author's inclusion of compelling examples greatly resonated with me. One instance involved their personal journey to accept a birthmark on their face and learn to appreciate it. Another example showcased accomplished individuals who achieved great success in spite of their flaws. This portrayal convincingly illustrates how imperfections can contribute to one's overall character
and do not hinder their potential for greatness.
In order to further strengthen my analysis and demonstrate a deeper understanding of the text, I could provide specific quotes or passages from the text to support my points. For example, I could quote the author's description of their own journey to accepting their birthmark, or I could cite examples of the renowned individuals mentioned in the text who achieved success despite their imperfections.
To analyze how the author distinguished their position from other positions, I could examine the language used in the text. Did the author explicitly state that their viewpoint was different, or did they present their argument in a unique way? Did they address opposing viewpoints and counter them with their own evidence and reasoning? By examining these aspects of the text, I can more effectively analyze how the author positioned their viewpoint.
Overall, with additional textual evidence and a deeper exploration of the author's viewpoint, my response would be more comprehensive and insightful.
Can you write an updated version but dont change alot of things just add the stuff she said to
The author's deliberate choice of structure enhances the reader's comprehension by providing detailed explanations and relatable anecdotes. They discuss personal obstacles, which fosters a connection with the audience. Additionally, the author draws on the lives of renowned individuals who, despite their imperfections, continue to inspire. This combination of personal narratives and external examples strengthens the author's argument and makes their viewpoint more relatable and compelling.
The primary intention of the author in "Perfectly Imperfect" is to advocate for the significance of imperfections and emphasize the importance of embracing them. The author strives to convey that these flaws contribute to one's uniqueness and should be a source of pride. By altering the prevailing perspective on imperfections, the author seeks to position them as admirable attributes. This purpose is evident through the author's consistent positive and upbeat tone throughout the text, demonstrating their affinity for the subject matter.
Considering the author's purpose and point of view facilitates a deeper understanding of the topic. It elucidates the reasons behind the author's exaltation of imperfections and highlights the societal pressure to conform to a flawless ideal. By examining the author's viewpoint, we can gain insight into their beliefs and values, as well as the underlying message they aim to convey.
The author's perspective diverges significantly from conventional notions, advocating for the overthrow of societal expectations and the acceptance of imperfections. In contrast, others may contend that flaws should be concealed, striving for perfection. However, the author substantiates their argument by providing compelling examples. They share their personal journey of accepting a birthmark and finding appreciation for it, as well as highlighting accomplished individuals who achieved great success despite their imperfections. By including these examples, the author effectively distinguishes their position from others and strengthens their viewpoint.
Engaging with contrasting viewpoints has revealed a distinct range of attitudes towards imperfections. Society indoctrinates individuals to adhere to particular standards, yet challenging these norms and forming personal viewpoints is imperative. By presenting different perspectives, the author encourages readers to critically examine their own beliefs and consider alternative viewpoints on embracing imperfections.
The author's inclusion of compelling examples greatly resonated with me. One instance involved their personal journey to accept a birthmark on their face and learn to appreciate it. Another example showcased accomplished individuals who achieved great success in spite of their flaws. This portrayal convincingly illustrates how imperfections can contribute to one's overall character and do not hinder their potential for greatness.
Overall, the author's purpose, point of view, and use of examples within the text highlight the significance of embracing imperfections. By considering the author's viewpoint and engaging with contrasting perspectives, readers can develop a deeper understanding of the societal pressure to conform to perfection and the importance of embracing one's flaws.
The author's deliberate choice of structure enhances the reader's comprehension by providing detailed explanations and relatable anecdotes. They discuss personal obstacles, which fosters a connection with the audience. Additionally, the author draws on the lives of renowned individuals who, despite their imperfections, continue to inspire. This use of structure helps the reader by providing concrete examples and relatable stories that support the author's argument.
The primary intention of the author in "Perfectly Imperfect" is to advocate for the significance of imperfections and emphasize the importance of embracing them. The author strives to convey that these flaws contribute to one's uniqueness and should be a source of pride. By altering the prevailing perspective on imperfections, the author seeks to position them as admirable attributes. This can be inferred from the author's positive tone and consistent adoration for imperfections throughout the text.
The author firmly believes that flaws should be embraced and celebrated, as evident in their choice of words, which consistently express adoration for imperfections. The overall tone of the text is positive and upbeat, underscoring their affinity for the subject matter. This can be seen through the author's use of language such as "unique," "special," and "admire" when referring to imperfections.
Considering the author's purpose and point of view facilitates a deeper understanding of the topic. It elucidates the reasons behind the author's exaltation of imperfections and highlights the societal pressure to conform to a flawless ideal. By examining the author's purpose and point of view, readers can better comprehend the underlying messages and arguments presented in the text.
The author's perspective diverges significantly from conventional notions, advocating for the overthrow of societal expectations and the acceptance of imperfections. In contrast, others may contend that flaws should be concealed, striving for perfection. However, the author substantiates their argument by providing compelling examples. This can be seen through the author's inclusion of personal anecdotes and stories of successful individuals who embraced their imperfections.
Engaging with contrasting viewpoints has revealed a distinct range of attitudes towards imperfections. Society indoctrinates individuals to adhere to particular standards, yet challenging these norms and forming personal viewpoints is imperative. This suggests that there are varying perspectives on imperfections, and the author's viewpoint offers a unique and refreshing take on the topic.
The author's inclusion of compelling examples greatly resonated with me. One instance involved their personal journey to accept a birthmark on their face and learn to appreciate it. Another example showcased accomplished individuals who achieved great success in spite of their flaws. This portrayal convincingly illustrates how imperfections can contribute to one's overall character. These examples strengthen the author's argument and provide evidence to support their perspective.