Chandragupta organized his empire very effectively, but also spied on his subjects. Was the trade off worth it?
Yes
No
The answer to whether the trade-off was worth it depends on one's perspective and values. Some may argue that Chandragupta's effective organization of the empire and his use of spying were necessary for maintaining stability, ensuring law and order, and protecting the interests of the empire. They may argue that the sacrifice of individual privacy and freedom was justified in order to achieve these goals.
On the other hand, others may strongly oppose any form of surveillance or infringement on personal liberties, regardless of the benefits it may bring. They may argue that the trade-off was not worth it, as it violates fundamental rights and undermines trust between the ruler and the people.
Ultimately, the assessment of whether the trade-off was worth it depends on the balance between the perceived benefits of effective organization and security, and the perceived costs of privacy invasion and erosion of individual freedoms.