Based on the map, why might some Southerners feel the Missouri Compromise favored the North?
Some Southerners might feel that the Missouri Compromise favored the North based on the map due to the following reasons:
1. Extension of Free States: The Missouri Compromise allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, balancing the new admission of Missouri as a slave state. This created a precedent of extending free states into the northern territories, which were seen as favoring the North's anti-slavery stance.
2. Limitation on Southern Expansion: The compromise also established the 36°30' parallel as the line dividing future slave and free states in the Louisiana Purchase territory. This limitation on southern expansion was seen as curtailing the South's ability to expand slavery further into the new territories, thus favoring the North's anti-slavery interests.
3. Population and Political Power: At the time, the North had a larger population compared to the South, and the Missouri Compromise resulted in an equal number of free and slave states to maintain a balance in representation in the Senate. However, as the map shows, much of the remaining western territories were designated as future free states, potentially giving the North an advantage in terms of population and therefore political power.
4. Economic Implications: Some Southerners believed that prohibiting the expansion of slavery in the western territories, as outlined by the Missouri Compromise, would prevent Southern agrarian interests from expanding their economic and political influence in those areas, further favoring the industrialized North.
Overall, these factors might lead some Southerners to perceive the Missouri Compromise as favoring the North, as it limited their expansion, potential political power, economic prospects, and perpetuated the balance of power in Congress.