In 1832 Jackson had vetoed a bill calling for an early renewal of the second bank's charter but the renewal was still possible when the charter expired in 1836 to prevent that from happening he set out to reduce the bank's economic power. based on the sentence above, what conclusions can you make about jackson's view on the second bank of the united states?
Andrew Jackson opposed the renewal of the bank.
Andrew Jackson opposed the renewal of the bank only because of new regulations.
The first conclusion that can be made is that Andrew Jackson opposed the renewal of the second bank's charter. This is evident from the fact that he vetoed a bill advocating for an early renewal in 1832.
The second conclusion is that Jackson was determined to reduce the bank's economic power. This can be inferred from the statement that he set out to diminish the bank's influence to prevent its renewal when the charter expired in 1836.
There is no information in the sentence suggesting that Jackson's opposition was solely based on new regulations. Therefore, the second conclusion stating "Andrew Jackson opposed the renewal of the bank only because of new regulations" is not supported by the given sentence.