Which statement best describes the effect of the bubonic plague on the Mongol territories?(1 point)
Responses
The bubonic plague weakened European neighbors and made it easier for the Mongols to invade Europe.
The bubonic plague weakened European neighbors and made it easier for the Mongols to invade Europe.
The bubonic plague strengthened trade between Asia and Europe because both needed key goods.
The bubonic plague strengthened trade between Asia and Europe because both needed key goods.
The bubonic plague had little effect on the Mongol territories because they had already been exposed to it.
The bubonic plague had little effect on the Mongol territories because they had already been exposed to it.
The bubonic plague politically weakened the divided territories and made them easier to overthrow.
The statement "The bubonic plague politically weakened the divided territories and made them easier to overthrow" best describes the effect of the bubonic plague on the Mongol territories.
Circles can fit through the gaps and are nearly equally distributed on both sides of the membrane.
Rephrase this sentence in prek
Circles can go through the spaces and are almost evenly spread on both sides of the barrier.
No, the triangles will remain on the left side because they are too large to pass through the membrane. Circles will remain evenly distributed on both sides due to size and movement.
Rephrase this sentence in prek
Triangles stay on left. Circles stay everywhere because they can move and they are small enough.
To determine the correct answer, let's go through each option and see which one is the most accurate.
Option 1: "The bubonic plague weakened European neighbors and made it easier for the Mongols to invade Europe."
This option suggests that the bubonic plague weakened Europe and aided the Mongols in invading. However, it is important to note that the Mongols were not directly responsible for spreading the bubonic plague, which primarily originated in China and was transmitted by fleas. The statement implies a cause-and-effect relationship between the Mongols and the spread of the plague, which is not entirely accurate.
Option 2: "The bubonic plague strengthened trade between Asia and Europe because both needed key goods."
This option suggests that the bubonic plague indirectly enhanced trade between Asia and Europe since they both needed essential goods. While the bubonic plague did have devastating consequences for societies, it also led to some long-term changes, including shifts in trade routes and connections between regions. Generally, this option is more accurate than option 1.
Option 3: "The bubonic plague had little effect on the Mongol territories because they had already been exposed to it."
This option implies that the Mongol territories were already exposed to the bubonic plague and therefore had little effect on them. However, it is important to note that the Mongol territories, like other regions, were indeed impacted by the bubonic plague. It caused significant loss of life and had socio-economic consequences.
Option 4: "The bubonic plague politically weakened the divided territories and made them easier to overthrow."
This option suggests that the bubonic plague politically weakened the territories, making them easier to overthrow. While the bubonic plague did cause societal upheaval and may have had some impact on political stability, it is worth noting that the Mongol territories already faced numerous challenges. Attribute their decline solely to the bubonic plague would oversimplify the situation.
Based on the analysis, the most accurate statement is Option 2: "The bubonic plague strengthened trade between Asia and Europe because both needed key goods." The bubonic plague did contribute to changes in trade patterns and interactions between Asia and Europe, as both regions needed certain goods.