(From "Video Gaming Should Be Considered a Sport" and "Gamers Are Not Athletes" , Illuminate) Question: What's the main difference in how "Video Games Should Be Considered Sports" and "Gamers are Not Athletes" talk about video gamers as athletes? (1 point) Responses "Video Games Should Be Considered a Sport" says that eSport gamers aren't physically fit like athletes, but "Gamers are Not Athletes" says they are true athletes. "Video Games Should Be Considered a Sport" says that eSport gamers aren't physically fit like athletes, but "Gamers are Not Athletes" says they are true athletes. "Video Games Should Be Considered a Sport" thinks eSport gamers are athletes because of their strategies and quick reactions, but "Gamers are Not Athletes" says they aren't athletes because they're not healthy and don't move around physically. "Video Games Should Be Considered a Sport" thinks eSport gamers are athletes because of their strategies and quick reactions, but "Gamers are Not Athletes" says they aren't athletes because they're not healthy and don't move around physically. "Video Games Should Be Considered a Sport" says eSport gamers are athletes because they make a lot of money, but "Gamers are Not Athletes" says they aren't athletes because they don't have many fans. "Video Games Should Be Considered a Sport" says eSport gamers are athletes because they make a lot of money, but "Gamers are Not Athletes" says they aren't athletes because they don't have many fans. "Video Games Should
Be Considered a Sport" emphasizes the physical fitness aspect of being an athlete, stating that eSport gamers are not physically fit like traditional athletes. On the other hand, "Gamers are Not Athletes" argues that gamers are true athletes, suggesting that physical fitness is not a defining factor for considering someone as an athlete.
