(From "Video Gaming Should Be Considered a Sport" and "Gamers Are Not Athletes", Illuminate)%0D%0A%0D%0AQuestion: What's the main difference in how "Video Games Should Be Considered Sports" and "Gamers are Not Athletes" talk about video gamers as athletes?
In "Video Gaming Should Be Considered a Sport," the author argues that video gamers should be considered athletes due to the mental skills and dedication required in competitive gaming. The focus is primarily on the skills, strategies, and practice involved in becoming a professional gamer. The article highlights the importance of hand-eye coordination, reflexes, decision-making abilities, and teamwork, which are qualities traditionally associated with athletes in physical sports.
On the other hand, "Gamers Are Not Athletes" challenges the notion that video gamers should be classified as athletes. The author argues that athleticism is primarily associated with physical activities that require strength, endurance, and physical prowess. The article emphasizes the distinction between physical skills and cognitive abilities, suggesting that video gamers do not meet the traditional criteria of being athletes.
While "Video Gaming Should Be Considered a Sport" focuses on the similarities between esports and traditional sports in terms of skills and competitiveness, "Gamers Are Not Athletes" emphasizes the inherent physicality necessary to be classified as an athlete.