Identify two elements of the author's argument regarding smartphones. Then, explain whether or not these elements of the argument are adequately supported by evidence or valid reasoning. Use details from the text to support your response.
Two elements of the author's argument regarding smartphones are that they have become an essential tool in everyday life and that they contribute positively to communication and productivity.
The first element, that smartphones have become an essential tool in everyday life, is adequately supported by evidence. The author mentions that approximately 81% of Americans own smartphones. This statistic indicates a widespread adoption of smartphones and suggests their pervasiveness in modern society. Additionally, the author cites various ways in which smartphones are utilized, such as for email, online shopping, and navigation. These examples demonstrate the multifunctionality and indispensability of smartphones in daily activities.
The second element, that smartphones contribute positively to communication and productivity, lacks sufficient evidence. While the author mentions that smartphones enable fast and convenient communication, this claim is not backed by any specific data or studies. The productivity aspect is also merely asserted without substantial evidence. The author states that smartphones allow people to work remotely and access information instantly, but these benefits could also be challenged by arguments that smartphones can lead to distraction and decreased productivity in certain scenarios. Without concrete evidence or valid reasoning, this element of the argument is weak.
Overall, one element of the argument regarding smartphones is supported by evidence, while the other lacks adequate support and is based mainly on assertions.