Which BEST explains why political cartoons are considered graphic design?
(1 point)
They incorporate images and words.
They are just like advertising slogans.
They have to be created by professionals.
They require the need to follow rules of color.
The best explanation for why political cartoons are considered graphic design is that they incorporate images and words.
The answer can be found by analyzing the characteristics and purpose of political cartoons. Political cartoons are considered graphic design because they incorporate images and words extensively. Rather than solely relying on images or text, political cartoons use a combination of visuals and textual elements to convey their message effectively. This means that cartoonists must possess skills in both visual design and linguistic expression.
Option 2, "They are just like advertising slogans," is not an accurate explanation. While political cartoons and advertising slogans both utilize visual elements, they differ in terms of their purpose and content. Political cartoons aim to satirize and comment on political events and figures, while advertising slogans focus on promoting products or services.
Option 3, "They have to be created by professionals," is partially correct. While many political cartoons are indeed created by professional cartoonists, amateur cartoonists can also create political cartoons. Therefore, it is not a definitive characteristic exclusive to political cartoons.
Option 4, "They require the need to follow rules of color," is not specifically applicable to political cartoons. While color schemes and usage can be important in graphic design, including political cartoons, it is not the only aspect that defines them as graphic design. The incorporation of images and words is a more essential characteristic.