Which statement accurately summarizes how the differences in military technology between the Spaniards and the Aztec and Inca affected their battles? (1 point)
The Aztec and Inca were able to successfully defend themselves against attacks with swords by skillful use of their bows and arrows and their superior protective armor.
While the Spaniards had access to gunpowder, the Aztec and Inca used steel weaponry to wound large numbers of Spanish forces.
The Aztec and Inca had the ability to overpower the Europeans because of the Indigenous groups' use of biological warfare.
While the Indigenous forces would number in the thousands at times when battling the Europeans, they were still no match for the military prowess of the Spaniards.
While the Indigenous forces would number in the thousands at times when battling the Europeans, they were still no match for the military prowess of the Spaniards.
The statement that accurately summarizes how the differences in military technology between the Spaniards and the Aztec and Inca affected their battles is:
"While the Spaniards had access to gunpowder, the Aztec and Inca used steel weaponry to wound large numbers of Spanish forces."
This statement highlights the fact that the Spaniards had advanced military technology and firearms, including gunpowder, while the Aztec and Inca primarily relied on steel weaponry. Though the Indigenous forces were able to inflict casualties on the Spanish with their steel weapons, the technological gap played a significant role in favor of the Spaniards.
Now, to arrive at this answer, one can analyze the historical accounts of the encounters between the Spanish conquistadors and the Aztec and Inca empires. By studying primary sources, such as journals, letters, or chronicles written by the conquistadors, historians can gain insight into the military technology used by both sides. Additionally, archaeologists have recovered artifacts and remnants of weaponry from battlefields, further illuminating the discrepancies in military technology. By examining these sources and considering the advantages and disadvantages of each side's technology, historians can then formulate an accurate summary of how technology affected the battles.