How was the US. Constitution different from the Articles of Confederation? (1 point)
The U.S. Constitution set up the first form of government for the newly independent United States.
The U.S. Constitution allowed for each state to have an equal vote in Congress regardless of size or population.
The US. Constitution separated powers between the judicial, legislative, and executive branches
The U.S. Constitution had only one branch, a unicameral legislature that had limited power
The U.S. Constitution and the Articles of Confederation were different in several ways. One key difference was that the U.S. Constitution established the first form of government for the newly independent United States, while the Articles of Confederation served as the original system of government during the Revolutionary War.
Additionally, the U.S. Constitution allowed for each state to have an equal vote in Congress regardless of size or population, ensuring that each state had a voice in the decision-making process. On the other hand, the Articles of Confederation gave each state only one vote in Congress, regardless of its size or population.
Another important difference is that the U.S. Constitution established a separation of powers between the judicial, legislative, and executive branches, ensuring that power was not concentrated in one branch of government. This system of checks and balances helps to prevent the abuse of power. In contrast, the Articles of Confederation did not separate powers as thoroughly, resulting in a weaker central government.
Furthermore, the U.S. Constitution created a bicameral legislature, consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate, with the power to pass and enact laws. The Articles of Confederation, however, had only one branch, a unicameral legislature, which had limited power and struggled to effectively govern the nation.
In summary, the U.S. Constitution differed from the Articles of Confederation in several ways: it established the initial system of government, ensured equal representation for each state, separated powers between branches, and created a bicameral legislature.
The correct answer is: The U.S. Constitution separated powers between the judicial, legislative, and executive branches.
To understand the differences between the U.S. Constitution and the Articles of Confederation, you can compare the key features of both documents.
1. The structure of government: The Articles of Confederation established a weak central government with limited powers. It created a unicameral legislature in which each state had one vote, regardless of its size or population. On the other hand, the U.S. Constitution created a more robust and balanced government with three separate branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This separation of powers helped to ensure checks and balances within the government.
2. Distribution of power: Under the Articles of Confederation, most powers were held by the individual states, while the central government had very limited authority. In contrast, the U.S. Constitution created a federal system in which power was shared between the federal government and the states. This allowed for a stronger central government that could address the needs of the nation as a whole.
3. Amendments and ratification: The Articles of Confederation required unanimous consent from all states to make amendments, making it difficult to pass any changes to the document. However, the U.S. Constitution established a more flexible amendment process, requiring approval by two-thirds of both houses of Congress or through a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of the states. This made it easier to adapt and update the Constitution as needed.
Overall, the U.S. Constitution created a stronger, more centralized government that addressed the limitations of the Articles of Confederation. Its separation of powers, federal system, and flexible amendment process have allowed the Constitution to endure for over two centuries as the foundation of the United States' government.