When a sample of rust was mixed with acid, the rust change into two simpler substances W and Z substances W and Z could not be broken down into simpler substances which statement is best supported by the evidence. A Russ is an element that breaks down into compound B, the substance W and Z are not made of atoms. See Russ is a compound made of two elements D, the substances W and Z compounds
The statement "The substance W and Z are not made of atoms" is best supported by the evidence provided. This is because if the substance W and Z could not be broken down into simpler substances, they must be elements, and elements are made up of atoms.
Based on the evidence provided, the statement "The substances W and Z are compounds" is best supported.
To arrive at this conclusion, we need to analyze the given information step by step:
1. "When a sample of rust was mixed with acid, the rust changed into two simpler substances W and Z."
This indicates that when rust reacted with acid, it decomposed into two simpler substances, W and Z.
2. "Substances W and Z could not be broken down into simpler substances."
This suggests that W and Z are not further decomposable into simpler components, implying that they are not elements.
3. "Rust is an element that breaks down into compound B."
This statement implies that rust is an element that itself can break down into a compound (identified as B). However, since W and Z are simpler substances derived from rust, it follows that they are not elemental, and therefore not made of atoms.
4. "The substances W and Z are compounds."
This statement aligns with our analysis as it confirms that W and Z are indeed compounds.
The statement that is best supported by the evidence is: "The substance W and Z are not made of atoms."
When the sample of rust was mixed with acid, it resulted in the formation of substances W and Z. The fact that these substances could not be broken down into simpler substances suggests that they are not made of atoms. This is because atoms are the building blocks of all matter, and any substance that cannot be broken down further must not be made up of atoms.
Additionally, the statement that "Rust is a compound made of two elements" is also supported by the evidence. The initial information provided states that rust is a compound, and it changes into substances W and Z. Therefore, it can be concluded that rust is composed of at least two elements.
To summarize, based on the evidence, it can be concluded that substances W and Z are compounds that cannot be broken down into simpler substances and are not made up of atoms. Rust itself is a compound consisting of at least two elements.