Which statement best explains the Twenty-Third Amendment’s changes to voting rights in the District of Columbia?(1 point) Responses Citizens in the District can be eligible for the military draft. Citizens in the District can be eligible for the military draft. Citizens residing in the District can vote for a presidential candidate. Citizens residing in the District can vote for a presidential candidate. Citizens residing in the District can elect members of Congress. Citizens residing in the District can elect members of Congress. Citizens residing in the District can elect a local government.
Citizens residing in the District can vote for a presidential candidate.
The Twenty-Third Amendment to the United States Constitution grants citizens residing in the District of Columbia the right to vote for a presidential candidate.
The statement that best explains the Twenty-Third Amendment's changes to voting rights in the District of Columbia is:
"Citizens residing in the District can vote for a presidential candidate."
To understand this, we need to look at the context of the amendment. The District of Columbia, where the capital of the United States is located, is not a state and has a unique political status. Prior to the Twenty-Third Amendment, residents of the District did not have the right to vote in presidential elections.
The amendment, ratified in 1961, sought to address this issue by giving the residents of the District the right to vote for electors for the Electoral College, who in turn vote for the President and Vice President of the United States. This means that citizens residing in the District can now participate in the selection of the President and have a say in the national leadership.
Therefore, the correct statement is that citizens residing in the District can vote for a presidential candidate.