Which of the following was NOT an example of British tyranny over the colonists?
(1 point)
Responses
Britain stationed a standing army in the colonies.
Britain stationed a standing army in the colonies.
Parliament instructed colonists to quarter British troops.
Parliament instructed colonists to quarter British troops.
Writs of assistance allowed the British army to search for smuggled goods.
Writs of assistance allowed the British army to search for smuggled goods.
An illumination was held when the British Parliament repealed the Stamp Act.
An illumination was held when the British Parliament repealed the Stamp Act.
The answer is: An illumination was held when the British Parliament repealed the Stamp Act.
To determine which of the following was NOT an example of British tyranny over the colonists, let's examine each option:
(1) Britain stationed a standing army in the colonies.
Explanation: During the colonial period, Britain did indeed station a standing army in the colonies. This was seen as an example of British tyranny because the presence of armed troops fueled tension and resentment among the colonists.
(2) Parliament instructed colonists to quarter British troops.
Explanation: This statement refers to the Quartering Act, passed by the British Parliament in 1765. It required colonists to provide housing, food, and other necessities to British troops stationed in the colonies. Many colonists considered this act a form of tyranny, as it imposed a burden on them and violated their rights.
(3) Writs of assistance allowed the British army to search for smuggled goods.
Explanation: Writs of assistance were essentially search warrants that allowed British officials, including the army, to search colonial property for smuggled goods. This practice was widely seen as an example of British tyranny since it violated the colonists' privacy and property rights.
(4) An illumination was held when the British Parliament repealed the Stamp Act.
Explanation: This statement does not represent an example of British tyranny. An illumination refers to the lighting up of buildings or streets in celebration or commemoration of an event. In this case, the illumination signifies the joyous response of the colonists to the repeal of the Stamp Act. It does not reflect British tyranny but rather a positive event for the colonists.
Therefore, the correct answer is (4) An illumination was held when the British Parliament repealed the Stamp Act, as it was not an example of British tyranny over the colonists.