Many people agree with zero-tolerance policies in
schools. However, some people disagree with these
policies. What is the MOST logical argument against
having a zero-tolerance policy?
(1 point)
Sometimes students should automatically be
suspended if they make a bad choice.
Sometimes students deserve to be bullied or
harassed by other classmates.
Some students will go unpunished because they are
not caught by a teacher.
Some students will be punished because they make
an error that meant no harm.
The most logical argument against having a zero-tolerance policy is: "Some students will be punished because they make an error that meant no harm."
The most logical argument against having a zero-tolerance policy is: Some students will be punished because they make an error that meant no harm.
The most logical argument against having a zero-tolerance policy in schools is presented in option 4: "Some students will be punished because they make an error that meant no harm." This argument emphasizes that not all rule violations warrant severe punishments like automatic suspension.
To explain how to arrive at this answer, let's analyze each option:
Option 1: "Sometimes students should automatically be suspended if they make a bad choice." This statement supports zero-tolerance policies, as it implies that any bad choice should result in automatic suspension. However, this option does not provide a direct argument against having a zero-tolerance policy.
Option 2: "Sometimes students deserve to be bullied or harassed by other classmates." This statement does not present a logical argument against zero-tolerance policies. It suggests that some students deserve to be mistreated, which is generally considered an unacceptable position.
Option 3: "Some students will go unpunished because they are not caught by a teacher." While this statement points out a potential flaw in enforcement, it does not directly challenge the entire concept of zero-tolerance policies. It focuses on the issue of consistency in catching rule violators rather than challenging the policy itself.
Option 4: "Some students will be punished because they make an error that meant no harm." This argument challenges the fairness and proportionality of zero-tolerance policies by highlighting that certain actions may be treated as severe violations without considering the intentions or lack of harm caused by the student. It suggests that punishment should be based on individual circumstances rather than a blanket policy.
By considering the logical flow of each argument and assessing which one directly opposes the concept of zero-tolerance policies, option 4 emerges as the most reasonable choice.
Michelle has frostbite. What MOST likely caused this frostbite?
(1 point)
She ate ice cream that was too cold.
She ran in extremely hot weather.
She drank too much water.
She didn’t wear enough clothing
The most likely cause of Michelle's frostbite is: "She didn’t wear enough clothing."
At a school assembly, ateachers heart stops beating, and the school nurse uses an electrical shock to get the teachres heart to beat again. What tool does the nurse MOST likely use to make this happen?
(1 point)
CPR.
FDA.
AED.
CDC