Which of the following statements would describe one strength of the Articles of Confederation?%0D%0A (1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AThe Confederation Congress could pass taxes.%0D%0AThe Confederation Congress could pass taxes.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe federal court system handled all judicial matters.%0D%0AThe federal court system handled all judicial matters.%0D%0A%0D%0AAny law passed by the Confederation Congress would override state laws.%0D%0AAny law passed by the Confederation Congress would override state laws.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe lack of an executive branch minimized the abuse of power.%0D%0AThe lack of an executive branch minimized the abuse of power.
The lack of an executive branch minimized the abuse of power.
The lack of an executive branch minimized the abuse of power.
The option that would describe one strength of the Articles of Confederation is: "The lack of an executive branch minimized the abuse of power." This statement highlights a key strength of the Articles of Confederation, which was the deliberate absence of a central executive authority. To arrive at this answer, we evaluate each statement and its implications.
1. "The Confederation Congress could pass taxes." - This statement is not a strength of the Articles of Confederation because although the Congress had the power to request taxes from the states, it lacked the authority to enforce or collect them. This limitation weakened the national government's ability to finance its operations and caused financial instability.
2. "The federal court system handled all judicial matters." - This statement is not accurate. The Articles of Confederation did not establish a federal court system with the power to handle all judicial matters. Instead, each state had its own courts, and disputes between states were resolved by a committee of state-appointed judges.
3. "Any law passed by the Confederation Congress would override state laws." - This statement is also inaccurate. Under the Articles of Confederation, the Congress did not have the power to enforce its laws directly on the states or override state laws. This limited the effectiveness of the national government in implementing policies and ensuring uniformity across states.
4. "The lack of an executive branch minimized the abuse of power." - This statement correctly identifies one of the strengths of the Articles of Confederation. By deliberately omitting an executive branch, power was more distributed among the states, reducing the potential for tyranny or abuse of power by a centralized authority. While this lack of executive leadership created other problems, such as weak enforcement and decision-making capabilities, it did prevent concentrated power in the hands of a single leader.
Therefore, the statement that describes one strength of the Articles of Confederation is: "The lack of an executive branch minimized the abuse of power."