Which piece of evidence would be relevant to the claim "Mulligan's T-shirts has the best price in town?"
1. There are several different cuts of t-shirts available
2. The other store in town charges 25% more for the same designs
3. Mulligan's offers more colors than any other store
4. Mulligan's t-shirt are more expensive than the ones on the internet
2. The other store in town charges 25% more for the same designs
The piece of evidence that would be relevant to the claim "Mulligan's T-shirts has the best price in town" is option 2: The other store in town charges 25% more for the same designs.
To determine which piece of evidence is relevant, we need to consider the claim itself. The claim is about having the best price in town, so we need evidence that compares Mulligan's prices to those of other stores in town.
Option 1, about different cuts of t-shirts, does not directly address the price of Mulligan's T-shirts. It provides information about the variety of t-shirt styles, but it does not speak to the claim about having the best price.
Option 3, about Mulligan's offering more colors than any other store, is also not directly related to the claim of having the best price. While it may be a factor for some customers, it does not provide specific information about pricing.
Option 4, about Mulligan's T-shirts being more expensive than the ones on the internet, actually contradicts the claim being made. If Mulligan's T-shirts are more expensive than the ones available online, it does not support the claim of having the best price in town.
Therefore, option 2 is the most relevant evidence because it directly compares Mulligan's prices to those of another store in town, suggesting that Mulligan's has the best price in comparison.