What was the NAACP’s role in Brown v. Board of Education?
A. The NAACP challenged Jim Crow laws as unconstitutional.
B. The NAACP challenged the Separate Car Act of Louisiana.
C. The NAACP challenged to expand the separate but equal doctrine.
D. The NAACP challenged the separate but equal doctrine.
D. The NAACP challenged the separate but equal doctrine.
D. The NAACP challenged the separate but equal doctrine.
The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) played a crucial role in Brown v. Board of Education by challenging the doctrine of "separate but equal." This doctrine, established by the Supreme Court in the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson, allowed for racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were deemed equal in quality.
The NAACP argued that segregated schools were inherently unequal and that they violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law. The organization supported several cases that challenged segregation in public schools, eventually culminating in Brown v. Board of Education. In that case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in 1954 that separate educational facilities based on race were inherently unequal and therefore unconstitutional. This landmark decision marked a significant turning point in the civil rights movement.
The correct answer is D. The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) played a significant role in the Brown v. Board of Education case by challenging the "separate but equal" doctrine that was established by the Plessy v. Ferguson decision in 1896. The NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, led by Thurgood Marshall, worked to prove that racial segregation in public schools violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
To find this answer, you could have used various methods. One way is by researching historical information about the NAACP's involvement in the civil rights movement and specific court cases. Another way is by reviewing the events leading up to the Brown v. Board of Education case and the arguments presented during the trial. Additionally, reading primary sources, such as court documents and speeches, could provide further insight into the NAACP's role.