How does Krakauer's choice to "give away" the ending support Krakauer's overall purpose?
A.
It highlights the danger of going into the wilderness unprepared.
B.
It allows readers to focus on the details of McCandless's life without wondering about what happens to him in the end.
C.
It increases the suspense in the novel because readers are wondering how McCandless died.
D.
It helps readers understand Jon Krakauer's own story better.
B.
B.
It allows readers to focus on the details of McCandless's life without wondering about what happens to him in the end.
To determine how Krakauer's choice to "give away" the ending supports his overall purpose, we need to understand the context and analyze the potential impacts of this decision.
In the book "Into the Wild" by Jon Krakauer, the author tells the true story of Chris McCandless, a young man who ventured into the Alaskan wilderness and tragically died.
A. Krakauer's choice to reveal the ending does not directly highlight the danger of going into the wilderness unprepared because the ending itself does not provide specific details about the dangers faced by McCandless.
B. This choice does allow readers to focus on the details of McCandless's life without wondering about his ultimate fate. By revealing what happens to McCandless at the beginning, Krakauer lets readers engage with his life events, choices, and motivations without any added curiosity about the outcome.
C. It's important to note that Krakauer's choice to reveal the ending at the beginning can't increase the suspense or curiosity about how McCandless died. Readers already know the end result, so the suspense lies in the journey, the choices made, and the insights that Krakauer provides along the way.
D. This is the most accurate choice. By giving away the ending, Krakauer contextualizes his own experiences and views within the broader narrative of McCandless's life. He shares how McCandless's story resonated with him personally, as he had previously embarked on similar wilderness adventures. Therefore, by divulging the ending at the outset, Krakauer helps readers understand his connection to McCandless and the significance of recounting this story.
Thus, the most fitting answer is D. It helps readers understand Jon Krakauer's own story better.