Why might an attorney utilize peremptory challenges?(1 point) Responses to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community to remove a potential juror based on gender to remove a potential juror based on gender to remove a potential juror based on race
An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges for various reasons. One main point is to remove potential jurors who exhibit prejudice or bias, as this could negatively affect the outcome of the trial. Additionally, peremptory challenges may be used to eliminate potential jurors based on their residence in the community, as their familiarity with the parties involved could potentially lead to bias. However, it is important to note that using peremptory challenges to remove potential jurors based on their gender or race is considered discriminatory and against legal ethical guidelines.
An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges to remove potential jurors who exhibit prejudice or bias. Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to object and remove potential jurors without providing a specific reason or cause. These challenges are intended to help create an impartial and fair jury by allowing each side to remove jurors whom they believe may be biased against their client or case. However, it's important to note that peremptory challenges cannot be used to discriminate on the basis of race, gender, or other protected characteristics. They must be exercised in a non-discriminatory manner and in accordance with the law.
An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias, or to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community, gender, or race.
