Which statement best analyzes how Lemon v. Kurtzman clarified the meaning of the First Amendment?(1 point) Responses It set the standard for what it meant for government to violate the Establishment Clause. It set the standard for what it meant for government to violate the Establishment Clause. It decided that the Establishment Clause enabled the government to give funding to all religious organizations equally. It decided that the Establishment Clause enabled the government to give funding to all religious organizations equally. It introduced the idea that religion should be separate from government. It introduced the idea that religion should be separate from government. It determined that the Establishment Clause was not violated if funding was used for secular purposes.
The statement "It determined that the Establishment Clause was not violated if funding was used for secular purposes" best analyzes how Lemon v. Kurtzman clarified the meaning of the First Amendment.
The statement that best analyzes how Lemon v. Kurtzman clarified the meaning of the First Amendment is: It introduced the idea that religion should be separate from government.
The correct statement that best analyzes how Lemon v. Kurtzman clarified the meaning of the First Amendment is: "It set the standard for what it meant for government to violate the Establishment Clause." The case of Lemon v. Kurtzman, decided by the Supreme Court in 1971, established the "Lemon test" as a three-pronged standard for evaluating whether government actions or policies violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Lemon test requires that a government action must have a secular purpose, its primary effect must not advance or inhibit religion, and it must not lead to excessive entanglement between government and religion. This case clarified the criteria for determining when government actions violate the Establishment Clause.
