You are NOT writing me a history of the war. You are writing whether or not the Mexicans and Americans had good reasons to go to war.

Your essay needs to say whether or not you believe the Mexican-American War was justified, and then you need to back up your opinion with reasons/evidence/details.

This may only be one paragraph long, but you need to back up your argument with evidence.

In my opinion, the Mexican-American War was not justified. The American expansionist policies and desires for territorial gains led to the conflict. The United States' annexation of Texas, which Mexico considered a rebellious province, escalated tensions between the two countries. Moreover, the disputed territory between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande River, where the war began, was highly ambiguous and did not warrant military intervention. Furthermore, the war was seen as a means to fulfill the manifest destiny narrative, promoting American dominance over Mexican territories. Thus, it is evident that American ambitions and territorial expansion fueled the war, without valid justifications.

Title: Justification of the Mexican-American War

The Mexican-American War, waged from 1846 to 1848, remains a topic of historical examination as to whether it was justified or not. In my analysis, I believe there were valid reasons that both the Mexicans and Americans had to engage in the conflict. The Americans believed that the territorial expansion of the United States was essential for its growth and security. They found cause in the annexation of Texas, as disputes arose regarding the southern boundary. Moreover, American interests to protect their citizens' lives and property in Mexican territories intensified tensions. On the other hand, Mexico firmly believed that the annexation of Texas by the United States was an unfair and illegal act. Mexico argued that this annexation violated previous agreements and represented an encroachment on their sovereignty. Additionally, Mexican resentment stemmed from border disputes and the desire to retain control over the region. In their defense, Mexico saw American expansion as an aggressive violation of their territorial integrity. Ultimately, the complex web of conflicts and interests on both sides contributed to the justification and motivations behind the Mexican-American War.

You need to write essay about all this

Title: Justification of the Mexican-American War

The Mexican-American War, waged from 1846 to 1848, remains a topic of historical examination as to whether it was justified or not. In my analysis, I believe there were valid reasons that both the Mexicans and Americans had to engage in the conflict.

The Americans believed that the territorial expansion of the United States was essential for its growth and security. They saw the annexation of Texas as a rightful and necessary action due to various factors. For one, disputes arose regarding the southern boundary of Texas, leading the United States to support Texas claims that the Rio Grande was the rightful border. This disagreement escalated tensions between the two nations. Furthermore, American interests were at stake in Mexican territories, particularly in regards to the lives and properties of American citizens. Incidents such as the killing of American settlers by Mexican troops further intensified these concerns and fueled American sentiments for military intervention. Thus, the Americans had valid reasons to see the war as a means to protect their interests, secure their borders, and ensure the safety of their citizens.

On the other hand, Mexico firmly believed that the annexation of Texas by the United States was an unfair and illegal act. Mexico argued that this annexation violated previous agreements and represented an encroachment on their sovereignty. From the Mexican perspective, the Americans were disregarding the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Mexico by claiming Texas as their own. Additionally, border disputes added fuel to Mexico's opposition to American expansion. The disputed territory between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande River, where the war began, was highly ambiguous, and Mexico deemed American military presence in the region as an invasion.

Mexican sentiment also stemmed from a desire to retain control over the region and protect their own interests. They saw American expansion as an aggressive violation of their territorial sovereignty and sought to defend what they considered rightfully theirs. Mexico's resistance was not only driven by a sense of national pride, but also by the fear of losing territories vital to their economic and strategic interests.

In conclusion, the Mexican-American War was a complex conflict fueled by a web of conflicts and interests on both sides. The Americans justified their involvement in the war based on their beliefs of manifest destiny and the need to secure their borders and protect citizens' lives and properties. On the other hand, Mexico saw American expansion as a violation of their sovereignty and a threat to their national interests. While there were valid justifications on both sides, the ultimate consequence of the war was the loss of land for Mexico and the expansion of American territories.

To determine whether the Mexican-American War was justified, we must examine the reasons presented by both sides. From the Mexican perspective, their opposition to Texas's independence and subsequent annexation by the United States was a major factor. They argued that Texas was still legally part of Mexico and that its independence was illegitimate. Additionally, Mexico feared the potential expansionist intentions of the Americans, who sought to acquire more territory. On the other hand, Americans believed in the idea of "manifest destiny," the belief that it was their divine right to expand territorial boundaries. They saw the war as an opportunity to fulfill their destiny and spread democracy. Furthermore, disputes over the Texas-Mexico border escalated tensions. Ultimately, while both sides can present valid justifications for their actions, the Mexican-American War remains a controversial event in history, with the scale of the conflict and its consequences raising questions about the fairness and necessity of the war.