How does the structure of Into the Wild support Krakauer's purpose?
A.
Waiting until the end to describe McCandless's last days keeps us from worrying about what happens.
B.
Waiting until the end to describe McCandless's last days allows Krakauer to tell his own story first.
C.
Waiting until the end to describe McCandless's last days allows us to get to know him first.
D.
Waiting until the end to describe McCandless's last days allows the suspense to continue building.
D. Waiting until the end to describe McCandless's last days allows the suspense to continue building.
The correct answer is D. Waiting until the end to describe McCandless's last days allows the suspense to continue building.
By structuring the book in this way, Krakauer is able to maintain the reader's interest and curiosity throughout the narrative. He gradually reveals details about McCandless's life and journey, building up the suspense and making the reader more invested in understanding what ultimately led to his tragic demise. This structure also allows Krakauer to explore McCandless's motivations, character, and the impact he had on those he encountered along the way, before revealing the outcome of his journey.
To determine which option best explains how the structure of "Into the Wild" supports Krakauer's purpose, we need to analyze the structure and Krakauer's purpose in writing the book.
The structure of the book is non-linear, jumping between different time periods and events. Krakauer starts by introducing the story of Chris McCandless and his ultimate fate, and then goes on to recount his own experiences as a mountaineer, drawing parallels between his own life and McCandless's. Throughout the book, Krakauer includes interviews, personal anecdotes, and reflections to shed light on McCandless's motivations and the various factors that may have contributed to his decision to venture into the Alaskan wilderness.
Krakauer's purpose in writing "Into the Wild" is multifaceted. He wants to understand and illuminate McCandless's character, explore the allure and dangers of the wilderness, and ultimately provoke reflection and discussion about the nature of survival, adventure, and self-discovery.
With this context in mind, option C, "Waiting until the end to describe McCandless's last days allows us to get to know him first," makes the most sense. By delaying the revelation of McCandless's fate and focusing on his experiences leading up to that point, Krakauer allows readers to fully understand and empathize with McCandless before reaching the tragic conclusion. This structure helps establish a connection between readers and McCandless, generating a sense of concern and investment in his story. Overall, option C aligns with Krakauer's purpose by promoting a deeper understanding of McCandless and his journey.