Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Two triangles ABC and GEF are represented. Segment AC and segment EG has single tick mark. Segment BC and segment GF has double tick marks.
The condition
proves that ∆ABC and ∆EFG are congruent by the SAS criterion.
If AB ≠ EF, the
criterion for congruency is violated. In this situation, angle C
angle G.
The condition "Segment BC and segment GF has double tick marks" proves that ∆ABC and ∆EFG are congruent by the SAS criterion.
If AB ≠ EF, the SSS criterion for congruency is violated. In this situation, angle C could still be congruent to angle G.
The condition "segment AC and segment EG has single tick mark, and segment BC and segment GF has double tick marks" proves that ∆ABC and ∆EFG are congruent by the SAS criterion.
If AB ≠ EF, the SAS criterion for congruency is violated. In this situation, angle C cannot be congruent to angle G.
To determine if triangles ABC and EFG are congruent using the SAS criterion, we need to analyze the given conditions.
SAS stands for "side-angle-side," meaning that if two triangles have corresponding sides in the same proportion (side-side) and an included angle that is congruent (angle), then the triangles are congruent.
From the given information, we know that segment AC and segment EG have a single tick mark, while segment BC and segment GF have double tick marks. This indicates that the lengths of AC and EG are equal, and the lengths of BC and GF are also equal. Therefore, we have the corresponding sides in the same proportion.
Additionally, the condition mentioned (which is not provided in the question) also needs to be met to prove congruency using the SAS criterion. Without this condition, we cannot make a conclusion about congruency.
However, the statement "If AB ≠ EF, the criterion for congruency is violated" indicates that if the lengths of AB and EF are not equal, then the criterion for congruency is violated. In this situation, it implies that if AB ≠ EF, the condition for congruency using the SAS criterion is not met.
Finally, the statement "In this situation, angle C < angle G" indicates that when the condition of congruency using the SAS criterion is violated (AB ≠ EF), angle C is less than angle G. This statement provides a comparison of the angles, suggesting that angle C is smaller than angle G when the criterion is not met.
In summary, to prove congruency using the SAS criterion for triangles ABC and EFG, we need the corresponding sides in the same proportion and an included angle that is congruent. If AB ≠ EF, the criterion for congruency is violated, and in this situation, angle C < angle G.