Even those who feel graffiti is an art form have a hard time making the same argument for tagging. Why is tagging a different problem than graffiti?
(1 point)
Tagging does not follow the elements of design.
Tagging does not follow the elements of design.
Tagging escalates very quickly and is often not really about art.
Tagging escalates very quickly and is often not really about art.
Tagging is an art form that requires more discipline than graffiti.
Tagging is an art form that requires more discipline than graffiti.
Tagging is more common in rural areas, which often object to public art.
Tagging is more common in urban areas and is often associated with vandalism and illegal activities.
The correct answer is:
Tagging escalates very quickly and is often not really about art.
The answer to the question "Why is tagging a different problem than graffiti?" is that tagging is often seen as distinct from graffiti because it does not follow the elements of design, escalates quickly, and is often not really about art. Unlike graffiti, which may be more regulated and can be considered a form of artistic expression, tagging is often characterized by quick, repetitive marks or signatures that are done hastily without much consideration for aesthetics or design principles. Tags are commonly used to mark territory or establish gang affiliations, leading to a negative connotation associated with vandalism and illegal activities.
To get this answer, one could conduct research or consult reliable sources such as articles or books that discuss the differences between graffiti and tagging. Additionally, talking to experts in art or urban studies could provide valuable insights into the subject matter.