9. Why were the Aztec weapons ineffective against the Spanish conquistadors? (1 point)
a. Lack of skilled warriors
Ob. Spanish had better armor
c. Aztec weapons were made of wood
d. Aztecs lacked military strategy
b. Spanish had better armor
b. Spanish had better armor
To determine the reason why the Aztec weapons were ineffective against the Spanish conquistadors, we can analyze each option and see which one aligns with historical facts.
Option a. Lack of skilled warriors: While it is true that the Aztecs did face challenges with their military tactics and strategies, and it is likely that they were not as experienced in warfare as the Spanish conquistadors, it is not the primary reason for their weapons being ineffective.
Option b. Spanish had better armor: This choice is a significant factor in the outcome of the battles between the Aztecs and the Spanish. The conquistadors had superior armor compared to the Aztecs, which consisted of plate armor and metal helmets. This gave them an advantage in terms of protection against the Aztec weapons.
Option c. Aztec weapons were made of wood: While it is true that Aztec weapons were predominantly made of wood, this is not the primary reason why they were ineffective. The Aztecs had weapons like obsidian-bladed swords, spears, and clubs which could inflict significant harm.
Option d. Aztecs lacked military strategy: This is another important factor that contributed to the Aztecs' defeat. The Spanish conquistadors had military strategies and tactics, along with superior weaponry and technological advancements. The Aztecs, on the other hand, were not as organized in their military approach.
Therefore, the most accurate option is b. Spanish had better armor. The superior armor of the Spanish conquistadors provided them with an advantage, allowing them to sustain less damage from the Aztec weapons and thus overpower the Aztec warriors.