Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners?
(1 point)
O They had more slaves to help them
O Farming along the coast provided everything they needed
• Living in the "breadbasket" provided them with enough money from their cash crops.
• Nearly everything they needed was made at home. Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners?
(1 point)
• They had more slaves to help them
• Farming along the coast provided everything they needed
• Living in the "breadbasket" provided them with enough money from their cash crops.
• Nearly everything they needed was made at home.
• Nearly everything they needed was made at home.
There are multiple reasons why backcountry colonists were more self-sufficient than plantation owners. One reason is that nearly everything they needed was made at home. They did not rely heavily on trade or external resources for their day-to-day needs. Farming along the coast, which provided everything plantation owners needed, was not the case for backcountry colonists. Additionally, living in the "breadbasket" did not provide them with enough money from cash crops. It is worth mentioning that having more slaves to help was not a contributing factor to their self-sufficiency.
Backcountry colonists were more self-sufficient than plantation owners primarily because nearly everything they needed was made at home. To understand this, let's consider the other options provided.
First, having more slaves to help them did not necessarily contribute to their self-sufficiency. While plantation owners did indeed have more slaves, this primarily facilitated large-scale commercial farming rather than self-sufficiency.
Second, farming along the coast providing everything they needed is not entirely accurate. While coastal farming did provide certain resources, such as seafood and salt, the backcountry colonists were not solely reliant on these coastal resources for their self-sufficiency.
Lastly, living in the "breadbasket" and having sufficient income from cash crops was not the main factor contributing to their self-sufficiency. The term "breadbasket" typically refers to regions that produce a surplus of grain for commercial purposes. However, self-sufficiency is based on producing what one needs for personal consumption rather than focusing solely on cash crops for income.
The key factor contributing to the backcountry colonists' self-sufficiency was the fact that they made nearly everything they needed at home. This meant they relied less on external sources for goods and services, allowing them to be more self-reliant. They typically produced their own food through subsistence farming, made clothing and household items themselves, and found ways to meet their needs within their local communities.
To summarize, the backcountry colonists were more self-sufficient than plantation owners mainly because they made almost everything they needed at home, reducing their reliance on external sources.