Why did Northern states fight against having enslaved people counted as full citizens?(1 point) Responses The South would benefit greatly from having a high population for high political power in the House of Representatives. The South would benefit greatly from having a high population for high political power in the House of Representatives. Northern states knew that they would politically benefit if their population was lower than Southern states. Northern states knew that they would politically benefit if their population was lower than Southern states. Northern states viewed enslaved people as property, thus they believed that enslaved people should not be counted as full citizens. Northern states viewed enslaved people as property, thus they believed that enslaved people should not be counted as full citizens. Northern states fought to have enslaved people counted as full citizens.
Northern states fought against having enslaved people counted as full citizens because they viewed enslaved people as property and believed that they should not be counted as full citizens.
Northern states fought against having enslaved people counted as full citizens because they viewed enslaved people as property and believed that they should not be considered as full citizens. They recognized that if enslaved people were counted as full citizens, the South would benefit greatly from having a higher population, which would result in more political power in the House of Representatives. Therefore, for political reasons, Northern states knew that they would benefit if their own population was lower than that of the Southern states.
Northern states fought against having enslaved people counted as full citizens because they believed that enslaved people should not be considered as property and should not have the same rights as free citizens. The North had already abolished slavery in their states and saw it as a moral issue. They argued that counting enslaved people as full citizens would give the Southern states an unfair advantage in political power, particularly in the House of Representatives. By having a higher population, the South would have more representatives and therefore more influence in the government. The Northern states feared that this would allow the Southern states to influence policies that would protect and perpetuate the institution of slavery. Their stance was not driven by a desire for lower population numbers but rather by a moral opposition to slavery and a concern for the balance of power within the government.
