Analyze why peasants resisted collectivization (1 point)
A. They preferred work in factones to taking jobs on collectives
B. They wanted to keep control of their land and did not want to work for the government in collective farms
C.They were working with foreign powers opposed to the Soviet Union
D.They feared the government would obstruct their plans to modernize their farms
B. They wanted to keep control of their land and did not want to work for the government in collective farms
The correct answer is B. They wanted to keep control of their land and did not want to work for the government in collective farms.
During collectivization in the Soviet Union, the government aimed to consolidate privately owned small farms into large collective farms, with the goal of increasing agricultural productivity and creating a socialist society. However, many peasants resisted this policy for various reasons.
One significant reason was the desire to maintain control over their land. Peasants had traditionally owned and worked on their own small plots of land, which provided them with a sense of independence and self-sufficiency. They were reluctant to give up their land to the government and work on collective farms where decisions about farming practices and production were made collectively.
Additionally, the forced collectivization meant that the government would have control over their farms and dictate how they should work. Peasants were skeptical about the efficiency and productivity of collective farms, as they feared that the government's agricultural policies might hinder their own plans to modernize and improve their farms.
It is important to note that while there were external forces opposed to the Soviet Union during this time, such as foreign powers, the primary reasons for peasant resistance to collectivization were internal to the Soviet Union itself.
To analyze why peasants resisted collectivization, we need to carefully consider each option provided and evaluate their plausibility.
Option A suggests that peasants preferred working in factories rather than taking jobs on collective farms. To determine if this is a valid point, one could research testimonies or interviews from peasants during that time period, analyze historical records, and consult scholars' opinions on the topic. Comparing the number of peasants working in factories versus collective farms may also provide valuable insight.
Option B proposes that peasants wanted to maintain control of their land and were reluctant to work for the government on collective farms. To evaluate the credibility of this point, one could examine the historical context surrounding collectivization and the impact it had on peasants' land ownership. Analyzing testimonies, legislation, and historical accounts can provide valuable evidence.
Option C suggests that peasants were working with foreign powers who opposed the Soviet Union. To evaluate this claim, one could investigate historical records, diplomatic reports, or intelligence documents to identify any evidence of foreign involvement in peasant resistance. Studying the geopolitical climate of the time may also offer insights into possible foreign influences.
Option D states that peasants feared the government would hinder their plans to modernize their farms. To analyze this point, one could examine the policies and directives issued by the government regarding modernization efforts. Assessing the extent to which the government supported or hindered such plans can provide relevant information. Additionally, researching testimonies or writings from peasants regarding their fears and perceptions of government intervention would be valuable.
By carefully considering and evaluating each option, using historical records, scholarly analysis, and primary sources, one can form a well-informed analysis of why peasants resisted collectivization.