An earthquake has a high magnitude but a low intensity. Which statement best explains this?
Magnitude measures the energy released by an earthquake, while intensity measures its duration
Magnitude measures the energy released by the earthquake, while intensity measures the amount of damage
Magnitude measures the duration of the earthquake, while intensity measures the amount of damage
Magnitude measures the duration of the earthquake, while intensity measures the energy released by an earthquake
Magnitude measures the energy released by the earthquake, while intensity measures the amount of damage
The correct statement is: Magnitude measures the energy released by the earthquake, while intensity measures the amount of damage.
The statement that best explains the scenario is: "Magnitude measures the energy released by the earthquake, while intensity measures the amount of damage."
Magnitude and intensity are two different measurements used to describe earthquakes. Magnitude is a quantitative measurement that represents the amount of energy released by an earthquake at its source. It is typically measured using instruments such as seismographs, and it is expressed on a logarithmic scale, such as the Richter or Moment Magnitude Scale. Higher magnitudes indicate a higher amount of energy released.
On the other hand, intensity is a qualitative measurement that describes the effects and damage caused by an earthquake at a specific location. It takes into account factors like building construction, local geological conditions, and distance from the epicenter. Intensity is usually measured using the Modified Mercalli Scale, which ranges from I to XII, with higher values indicating more severe damage.
In the given scenario, if an earthquake is described as having a high magnitude but a low intensity, it means that it released a significant amount of energy at its source (as indicated by the high magnitude), but the effects and damage at specific locations were relatively minor (as indicated by the low intensity).