Marisol wants a data structure that is as flexible and controllable as possible. Which of these would be most appropriate?
(1 point)
Responses
primitive
primitive
built-in
built-in
user-defined
user-defined
string
string
user-defined
The most appropriate data structure for Marisol that is as flexible and controllable as possible would be a user-defined data structure.
To determine which data structure would be most appropriate for Marisol's needs, let's explore each option and evaluate their flexibility and controllability.
1. Primitive data type: Primitives are basic data types provided by the programming language, such as integers, floats, booleans, etc. While they are simple and efficient, they may not offer the desired flexibility and controllability for Marisol's use case. Primitives have fixed sizes and limited operations.
2. Built-in data structure: Built-in data structures are commonly provided by programming languages, such as arrays, lists, sets, dictionaries, etc. They offer more flexibility and control than primitive data types. They have predefined functions and methods for performing various operations like insertion, deletion, sorting, searching, etc.
3. User-defined data structure: User-defined data structures are created and defined by the programmer according to the specific requirements of the application. This could include customized data structures like stacks, queues, trees, graphs, etc. User-defined data structures offer the highest level of flexibility and control as they can be tailored to meet Marisol's specific needs.
4. String: A string is a sequence of characters. While it is a specific type of data structure, it may not offer the level of flexibility and controllability Marisol desires, especially for complex data management.
Based on the given options, the most appropriate choice for Marisol would be a user-defined data structure. By creating a custom data structure, Marisol can design it to fit her specific requirements, providing the flexibility and control she desires.