What presidential power under the constitution led the anti federalist to urge for a bill of rights
Veto power over acts of congress
Military power as commander in Chief
The power to carry out the law passed by congress
The power to declare states of emergency without consulting congress
The power that led the Anti-Federalists to urge for a Bill of Rights was the power to carry out the law passed by Congress. The Anti-Federalists were concerned that without a guarantee of individual rights, the president would have the authority to enforce laws passed by Congress in a way that could infringe upon the liberties of the people. They argued that a Bill of Rights was necessary to protect the rights of individuals and limit the power of the president in this regard. The concerns over veto power, military power, and emergency declarations were also present, but the power to carry out the law passed by Congress specifically highlighted their worries.
The presidential power under the constitution that led the anti-federalists to urge for a bill of rights was the power to carry out the law passed by Congress.
To understand why the anti-federalists were concerned about this power and why they called for a bill of rights, let's break it down step by step:
1. The Constitution grants the president the power to execute the laws passed by Congress. This means that the president has the authority to enforce and implement the legislation created by Congress.
2. The anti-federalists were wary of giving the president too much power to carry out the laws without any checks or limitations. They were concerned that a strong executive branch could potentially infringe upon individual rights and liberties.
3. To address these concerns, the anti-federalists argued for the inclusion of a bill of rights in the Constitution. A bill of rights would specifically outline the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals, protecting them from any potential abuse of power by the president or the federal government.
So, in summary, the power of the president to carry out the laws passed by Congress was a key concern for the anti-federalists. They believed that without a bill of rights, this power could potentially be used to infringe upon individual rights and liberties. By advocating for a bill of rights, they sought to ensure that certain rights and freedoms were explicitly protected in the Constitution.