Which of the following best suggests the significance of Matteo Ricci’s success in getting access to Beijing?(1 point) Responses Christianity was becoming an important religion in Ming China. Christianity was becoming an important religion in Ming China. Ricci brought Western knowledge and spread it to the Chinese people. Ricci brought Western knowledge and spread it to the Chinese people. Ming China efforts to keep Europeans at a distance were failing. Ming China efforts to keep Europeans at a distance were failing. Ricci was allowed in Beijing because the Europeans had decided to become Chinese tributes.
Ricci brought Western knowledge and spread it to the Chinese people.
The correct answer is: Ricci brought Western knowledge and spread it to the Chinese people.
Matteo Ricci's success in gaining access to Beijing was significant because he brought Western knowledge and spread it to the Chinese people.
To determine the best answer that suggests the significance of Matteo Ricci's success in gaining access to Beijing, we can analyze the options given one by one.
1. "Christianity was becoming an important religion in Ming China."
2. "Ricci brought Western knowledge and spread it to the Chinese people."
3. "Ming China's efforts to keep Europeans at a distance were failing."
4. "Ricci was allowed in Beijing because the Europeans had decided to become Chinese tributes."
To understand the significance of Ricci's success in accessing Beijing, we need to consider the historical context. During the Ming Dynasty, China was relatively closed off to foreigners and had strict policies to limit their influence. With this in mind, let's evaluate the options:
1. Although Christianity did gain some followers in Ming China, it was not yet an important or widespread religion during that time. This option is unlikely to be the most significant factor in explaining Ricci's success.
2. This option seems plausible as Ricci was known for bringing Western knowledge, particularly in the areas of mathematics and astronomy, as well as introducing Western scientific ideas to the Chinese people. This exchange of knowledge could be considered a significant aspect of Ricci's accomplishment.
3. Ming China's efforts to keep Europeans at a distance were indeed failing. However, this option only suggests a general trend rather than specifically explaining the significance of Ricci's success in accessing Beijing.
4. The notion that Ricci was allowed in Beijing because the Europeans decided to become Chinese tributes is not accurate. Ricci's success can be attributed to his fluency in the Chinese language, his understanding of Chinese culture, and his ability to gain the trust and favor of influential figures.
Based on the analysis, option 2, "Ricci brought Western knowledge and spread it to the Chinese people," appears to best suggest the significance of Matteo Ricci's success in accessing Beijing.