Use the excerpt to answer the question. “The government lacks the resources to give each soldier enough to sustain [support] him, and this fact has not caused desertion to decrease. On this date 311 men are missing from the . . . division. . . . I have ordered the paymaster . . . to purchase and bring here the 150 loads of flour for the relief . . . of the [soldiers]. . . . I have absolutely nothing on hand . . . and the entire population is in the same unfortunate condition.” —Antonio Martinez, Spanish Governor of Texas, Letter to General Joaquin Arredondo, June 19, 1820 How can historians use and manage information about the lack of food and other resources mentioned in Governor Martinez’s letter to determine how the Mexican settlement of Texas contrasted from the earlier Spanish settlement of this region? (1 point) Responses Mexico offered soldiers from the United States Army cheap land to defend the Texas frontier. Mexico offered soldiers from the United States Army cheap land to defend the Texas frontier. Mexico abandoned the Spanish plan of building presidios to defend local settlements. Mexico abandoned the Spanish plan of building presidios to defend local settlements. Mexico required Tejano settlers to defend themselves against a possible French invasion. Mexico required Tejano settlers to defend themselves against a possible French invasion. Mexico placed former Spanish missions in Texas under civilian control. Mexico placed former Spanish missions in Texas under civilian control. Skip to navigation
Historians can use the information from Governor Martinez's letter to determine that the Mexican settlement of Texas contrasted from the earlier Spanish settlement in that Mexico lacked the resources to adequately support its soldiers, leading to desertion and a lack of food and resources for the population. This suggests that Mexico may have had difficulties maintaining control and providing for its settlements in Texas, possibly leading to a less stable and secure environment compared to the earlier Spanish settlement.
just say one of the answers
Mexico abandoned the Spanish plan of building presidios to defend local settlements.
Historians can use the information about the lack of food and resources mentioned in Governor Martinez's letter to determine that the Mexican settlement of Texas contrasted from the earlier Spanish settlement in the region by noting that Mexico lacked the resources to support its soldiers, leading to desertion and a lack of supplies. This suggests that Mexico may have abandoned the Spanish plan of building presidios to defend settlements and may have placed former Spanish missions in Texas under civilian control. Additionally, the letter indicates that the entire population, including the soldiers, was in a "unfortunate condition." This implies that Mexico required Tejano settlers to defend themselves against a possible French invasion, as they did not have the necessary resources or support from the government.
To answer this question, historians can use the information from Governor Martinez's letter about the lack of food and resources to determine how the Mexican settlement of Texas contrasted from the earlier Spanish settlement in the region. By analyzing this excerpt, historians can gather several important insights:
1. Lack of Resources: The letter states that the government lacks the resources to provide enough sustenance for the soldiers, resulting in desertion and a significant number of soldiers going missing. This suggests that the Mexican government was facing difficulties in providing for its military forces.
2. Relief Efforts: Governor Martinez mentions ordering the paymaster to purchase and bring 150 loads of flour for the soldiers' relief. This indicates that the Mexican government was making efforts to address the lack of resources, although it is mentioned that there was nothing on hand and the population in general was also facing a similar condition.
Based on this information, historians can infer that the Mexican settlement of Texas contrasted from the earlier Spanish settlement in several ways:
1. Struggling Resources: The lack of resources and the inability of the government to sustain the soldiers highlight a potential difference in the management and allocation of resources between the Spanish and Mexican administrations. It suggests that the Mexican settlement may have faced more challenges in providing for its population compared to the earlier Spanish settlement.
2. Potential Shift in Priorities: The fact that the Mexican government was offering cheap land to soldiers from the United States Army to defend the Texas frontier (as mentioned in the given answer choices) could indicate a shift in priorities from the earlier Spanish plan of building presidios to defend local settlements. This suggests that the Mexican settlement may have taken a different approach to frontier defense compared to the Spanish settlement.
Based on this analysis, historians could conclude that the Mexican settlement of Texas, as indicated by Governor Martinez's letter, differed from the earlier Spanish settlement in terms of resource management and potential changes in frontier defense strategies.