Which BEST explains why early print sources have very few illustrations?

(1 point)
Responses

They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.

They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.

They were the most expensive part of the printing process.

They were the most expensive part of the printing process.

Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.

Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.

Society at the time did not trust information that came from images.

They required a lot of ink, which was very costly is the most accurate explanation.

The best explanation for why early print sources have very few illustrations is that most events did not require images to be clearly understood.

The best explanation for why early print sources have very few illustrations is that most events did not require images to be clearly understood.