Video is now a permanent part of journalism. Based on what you know about the development of the photojournalism, which BEST explains how this became popular?

(1 point)
Responses

Graphic designers were able to create chyrons to identify news organizations.
Graphic designers were able to create chyrons to identify news organizations.

Video footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.
Video footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.

Graphic designers prefer to work with video footage, so they changed photojournalism.
Graphic designers prefer to work with video footage, so they changed photojournalism.

Video footage is now much more available than photography, replacing photos entirely.

Video footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.

The correct answer is: Video footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.

Based on what I know about the development of photojournalism, the best explanation for video becoming a permanent part of journalism is that video footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily. This means that journalists could capture and convey news stories through moving images, providing a more immersive and dynamic experience for the audience. Video footage also allows for capturing sound and interviews, providing a more comprehensive representation of events. This shift in technology and affordability made video an attractive and effective medium for journalism, leading to its popularity and integration into the field.