Which statement best explains why anti-british settlement was less than South Carolina then in many other colonies a South Carolina was not as successful as the other colonies and it could not afford to raise funds to fight the British be South Carolina had more British settlers than the other colonies which made the colony more loyal to Great Britain see South Carolina was a younger colony than most of the others as a result it still needed much support from Great Britain or Dee South Carolina was less affected by a number of British laws and was permitted to continue to trade its staple rice crop
The statement "South Carolina was less affected by a number of British laws and was permitted to continue to trade its staple rice crop" best explains why anti-British settlement was less in South Carolina than in many other colonies.
The statement that best explains why anti-British sentiment was less in South Carolina compared to other colonies is that South Carolina was less affected by a number of British laws and was permitted to continue trading its staple rice crop.
The statement that best explains why anti-British sentiment was less in South Carolina compared to many other colonies is the last one: "South Carolina was less affected by a number of British laws and was permitted to continue to trade its staple rice crop."
To arrive at this answer, first, let's break down the other options and understand why they are not best explanations:
1. "South Carolina was not as successful as the other colonies and could not afford to raise funds to fight the British": While financial success plays a role in anti-British sentiment, it is not the primary driver in this case since the question is focused specifically on anti-British settlement. Furthermore, the option does not explain why anti-British sentiment was less in South Carolina compared to other colonies.
2. "South Carolina had more British settlers than the other colonies, which made the colony more loyal to Great Britain": The presence of British settlers does not necessarily imply greater loyalty to Great Britain, as loyalty can be influenced by various factors. While having more British settlers may contribute to some loyalty, it does not fully explain the lower anti-British sentiment compared to other colonies.
3. "South Carolina was a younger colony than most of the others, as a result, it still needed much support from Great Britain": Although being a younger colony may require support from Great Britain, it does not directly explain why anti-British sentiment was less in South Carolina. Additionally, younger colonies might still develop anti-British sentiment despite needing support.
The best explanation is the last statement: "South Carolina was less affected by a number of British laws and was permitted to continue to trade its staple rice crop." This explanation suggests that since South Carolina was allowed to trade its staple rice crop without significant interference from British laws, it experienced fewer negative impacts compared to other colonies. This likely contributed to a lesser degree of anti-British sentiment among the South Carolina settlers.