Time (years) and Bear Population: 1 year 6 bears, 20 years 120 bears, 60 years 240 bears.

One biologist claimed that the bear population was proportionally related to the number of years after they were reintroduced into the wild. Based on the information in the table, would you agree? Explain your answer.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios of the first two rows.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.

The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios of the first two rows.

Based on the information provided, I would say that the bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years after they were reintroduced into the wild because the ratio in the last row (60 years: 240 bears) is not equal to the ratios of the first two rows (1 year: 6 bears and 20 years: 120 bears).

The correct answer is: The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.

To explain the answer: In order to determine if the bear population is proportionally related to the number of years, we need to compare the ratios of bear population to years.

In the given table, we have the following ratios:

Year 1: 6 bears / 1 year = 6 bears/year
Year 20: 120 bears / 20 years = 6 bears/year
Year 60: 240 bears / 60 years = 4 bears/year

If the bear population is proportionally related to the number of years, the ratio should be the same for each row. However, in this case, the ratio is not the same for each year.

In the first two rows, the ratio is 6 bears/year. But in the last row, the ratio is 4 bears/year. Since the ratios are not equivalent, we can conclude that the bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years based on the information given in the table.